Fort St. John Pilot Project

Home

SiteMap

Links

Contact Us

       



  • The Project
  • FSJ Pilot Regulations
  • CSA
  • SFMP
  • Annual Reports
  • FOS
  • Public Advisory Group
  • STAC
  • Presentations
  • Reference Material
  • What's New
  • The Participants
  • Questions & Answers


  • DISTURBANCE UNITS DESCRIPTIONS

     

    Introduction

    There has been a steady increase in the use of our knowledge of natural disturbance dynamics as a basis for forest management policy directed towards maintaining biological diversity (Booth et al. 1993, Biodiversity Guidebook… 1995). The underlying assumption is that the biota of a forest is adapted to the conditions created by natural disturbances and thus should cope more easily with the ecological changes associated with forest management activities if the pattern and structure created resemble those of natural disturbance (Hunter 1993, Swanson et al. 1993, Bunnell 1995, DeLong and Tanner 1996, Bergeron and Harvey 1997, Angelstam 1998, DeLong and Kessler 2000).

    For a variety of reasons, past forest management policies and guidelines have been directed towards setting somewhat arbitrary limits. These limits were often related to maximizing timber volume or creating conditions that favoured certain organisms (e.g., ungulates). Limits were often stated for things such as patch size, species composition, stand density, non-forested area and soil disturbance. Although well meaning and easily administered, these practices result in patterns bearing little relationship to those created by natural disturbance dynamics. Studies of natural disturbance in the boreal forest have demonstrated large ranges in disturbance patch size (Eberhart and Woodward 1987, DeLong and Tanner 1996), tree density (DeLong and Kessler 2000), and volume of coarse woody debris (CWD) (Clark et al. 1998, DeLong and Kessler 2000)

    The Biodiversity Guidebook (1995) was the first attempt in British Columbia to present guidance for forest management based on the natural disturbance template. Specific guidance for seral stage distribution, patch size, wildlife tree patch amount, and spatial arrangement and more general guidance on species composition and stand structure were included in this guide. Since the completion of the Biodiversity Guidebook, more information on natural disturbance dynamics has become available. Within the Prince George Forest Region a number of studies have investigated particular aspects of natural disturbance (e.g., DeLong 1998, DeLong and Kessler 2000, Lewis and Lindgren 2000, Rogeau 2001). This document is meant to present updated guidance for the Prince George Forest Region based on this new information. Unlike the Biodiversity Guidebook, this document presents goals based on the “range of natural variability” and does not present any numbers that represent a compromise between biodiversity and timber management. Thus this document presents guidance based on “the best available information” that would result in the least possible differences between harvesting and natural disturbance.

    Instead of adopting the Natural Disturbance Types (NDT’s) presented in the Biodiversity Guidebook (1995) this document presents information for 9 Natural Disturbance Units (NDU’s) (Figure 1). These units are felt to better separate areas based on differences in disturbance processes, stand development, and temporal and spatial landscape pattern. In the drawing of the boundaries of the NDU’s, Landscape Unit boundaries were used whenever possible. This avoids the problem of having very small areas within a planning unit with different guidance than the rest of the unit.


    Figure 1. Natural Disturbance Units of the Prince George Forest Region.


    Information presented for each Natural Disturbance Unit (NDU) includes: background information on location, climate and vegetation; discussion of natural disturbance ecology; discussion of the major effects of forest management on natural patterns; and recommended practices based on the natural disturbance template. Table 1 provides a breakdown of biogeoclimatic units found within each of the NDU’s.

    Table 1.  List of biogeoclimatic units within each of the Natural Disturbance Units

    Natural Disturbance Unit

    Biogeoclimatic Units1

    Boreal Plains - Alluvial

    BWBSmw2

    Boreal Plains - Upland

    BWBSmw1, BWBSmw2, (BWBSwk1, BWBSwk2, SWBmk)

    Boreal Foothills - Valley

    BWBSwk1, (BWBSmw1)

    Boreal foothills - Mountain

    ESSFmv2, (ESSFwk2, ESSFwc3)

    Wet Mountain

    SBSvk, ESSFwk2, ESSFwc3, (SBSwk1, SBSwk2, ESSFmv2)

    Wet Trench - Valley

    ICHwk3, ICHvk2, SBSvk, (ICHwk2, SBSwk1)

    Wet Trench - Mountain

    ESSFwk1, ESSFwk2, ESSFwc3, (ESSFmm)

    Moist Trench – Valley

    ICHmm, SBSdh, (ICHwk1, SBSvk)

    Moist Trench - Mountain

    ESSFmm, (ESSFwc2)

    McGregor Plateau

    SBSwk1, (ESSFwk2, SBSwk2)

    Moist Interior - Plateau

    SBSdk, SBSdw2, SBSdw3, SBSmc2, SBSmc3, SBSmk1, SBSmw, SBSwk3a, (SBPSdc,SBPSmc, SBSdw1, SBSmh, SBSwk1)

    Moist Interior - Mountain

    ESSFmv1, ESSFmv3, (ESSFwk1)

    Omineca - Valley

    BWBSdk1, BWBSwk2, SBSmk1, SBSmk2, SBSwk2, SBSwk3, (ICHmc1, SBSdk, SBSmc2, SWBmk)

    Omineca - Mountain

    ESSFmc2, ESSFmv3, ESSFmv4, (ESSFwv, SWBmk)

    Northern Boreal Mountains

    BWBSdk1, BWBSdk2, SWBmk, (ESSFmc, ESSFmv4, BWBSmw2, BWBSwk2, BWBSwk3)

    1 Units in brackets cover a minor (i.e., <5%) portion of the Natural Disturbance Unit.


    Moist Interior

    Location, Climate, and Vegetation

    This unit occupies the gently rolling terrain and broad mountain peaks of the Fraser Plateau and the Fraser Basin Ecoregions. This NDU is found over a wide geographic range, from 53° - 55° N latitude and 122° - 125° W longitude. The elevation range of this NDU is 600 – 1800m but most of it is between 700 – 1200m.

    The climate of this unit is continental, and is characterized by seasonal extremes of temperature; severe, snowy winters; relatively warm, moist, and short summers; and moderate annual precipitation (Meidinger et. al. 1991). Excluding the Boreal Plains, this is drier than the other NDU’s in the region. It is intermediate in temperature between the colder montane and northern units, and warmer trench units. Mean annual temperature (MAT) for moist of this unit ranges from 0.6 to 3.7°C. Average temperature is below 0°C for 4-5 months of the year, and above 10°C for 2-5 months. Mean annual precipitation (MAP) data from long-term stations ranges from 481-727 mm, of which perhaps 25-50% is snow. Higher elevation mountains in the unit will likely have a more severe climate (i.e., lower temperatures, more precipitation, more snow) but no data is available for these areas. 

    Upland coniferous forests dominate the Moist Interior - Plateau landscape. Hybrid white spruce (Picea engelmannii x glauca) and subalpine fir are the dominant climax tree species. Lodgepole pine is very common in mature forests throughout the unit and both lodgepole pine and trembling aspen pioneer the extensive seral stands. Paper birch is another pioneer tree, often on moist, rich sites. Douglas fir is usually a long-lived seral species, occurring most abundantly on dry and warm sites in the southeastern part of this unit. Black spruce also occurs in climax upland forest in combination with lodgepole pine on sites with restricted rooting. Forests at higher elevations (>1100m) will have a higher subalpine fir component.

    Alluvial forests of black cottonwood, often with a minor component of spruce, occur to a limited extent on active floodplains of the major streams and rivers. Wetlands are common and dot the landscape in poorly drained, postglacial depressions or river ox-bows.

    Wetland community types include Carex (sedge) marshes, shrub fens of Betula glandulosa (scrub birch), B. pumila (swamp birch), and Salix spp. (willows), treed fens and swamps with black and hybrid white spruce, and black spruce — Sphagnum bogs. Acidic, nutrient-poor bogs are less common than the richer wetland types (marshes, fens, and swamps). Tamarack occurs in a number of wetlands south of the Nechako River.

    Natural grassland and shrub-steppe are uncommon in this NDU, occurring on some warm, dry sites scattered in the major valleys.

    Natural Disturbance Ecology

    Fire and mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) are the key stand-replacement disturbance agents operating in this unit. The disturbance rate[1][1] for the plateau and mountain portions of this unit are estimated to be 0.75 - 1.25 % [2][2] and 0.48 % of the total forested area/yr respectively (DeLong 1998). The fire cycles assigned to these unit are 100 and 200 respectively, based on work conducted by Andison (1996) and DeLong (1988). Table 2 shows the amount of forests of different age that would be associated with this fire cycle. Large wildfires (> 1,000 ha) dominated the landscape and were regenerated quickly by dense lodgepole pine and/or trembling aspen resulting in large patches of relatively even-aged forests (Table 2). Minor amounts of young white and/or black spruce forest could be found in wetter patches within the fire boundaries often adjacent to unburned mature forest not burned by the fire. Young Douglas fir stands can be found on drier ridges near larger Douglas-fir veterans that have escaped the fire. Small areas where fire was intense may regenerate to willow or alder (Delong, unpublished data). Stand ages rarely exceeded 200 years, except in the more mountainous areas, but relatively large patches (>100 ha) of older forest (140 – 180 yrs) could be found scattered across the landscape (Andison 1996, DeLong and Tanner 1996). Although patches of old forest (> 140 yrs) likely always occurred in the landscape their position would have moved around the landscape over time. Within the boundaries of the fires 3-15% of total area of the fire can be composed of unburned mature forest remnants (DeLong and Tanner 1996). These mature forest remnants are distributed throughout all landscape positions including flat lodgepole pine stands (DeLong and Tanner 1996). Very little remnant structure exists outside of these patches. Data from DeLong and Tanner (1996) indicate that there was <1 live remnant tree/ha outside of remnant patches. More live remnant trees likely occur in areas with a higher component of Douglas-fir due to their increased ability to survive fire, but this has not been tested. 

    During stand development, increasing amounts of white spruce, black spruce, and subalpine fir will occur in stands originally dominated by lodgepole pine or trembling aspen. This increase occurs more rapidly and these species become a more dominant portion of the canopy on wetter sites. Douglas fir will be co-dominant where established with lodgepole pine. Post-fire stands are very dense except on the wettest sites and then self thin over time (Table 3). Density of snags > 7.5 cm dbh generally exceeds 100 sph and is highest in mature stands due the effect of self-thinning (Table 3). Larger diameter trees and snags (>15 cm dbh) are most abundant in stands exceeding 140 yrs of age but do occur in stands of all ages (Table 3).

    Coarse woody debris (CWD) volume ranges considerably in response to the time since the last fire, age of the stand at time of the fire, and number of times it has burned (Table 4). Fires may burn over the same area 2 –3 times within a short period of time (<50 yrs) leaving very little dead wood on the ground. CWD volumes are highest in young stands due to large amount of wood that is left over from the previous stand (Table 3). Very little of the main stem wood of mature live trees is actually consumed by fire and


     

    Table 2. Estimates of statistics relating to temporal and spatial pattern of natural disturbance in the Natural Disturbance Units of the Prince George Forest Region.

    Natural Disturbance Unit

    Stand Replacement

    Disturbance Cyclel

    Range in proportion of total forested area

    Patch Size (% of total disturbance area)

    Disturbance type (% of disturbance area)

    >250 yrs

    >140 yrs

    >100 yrs

    <40 yrs

    >1000

    100 -1000

    51 - 100

    <50

    Stand Replacement

    Gap Replacement

    Boreal Plains - Alluvial

    200

    0.23 - 0.36

    0.44 - 0.57

    0.61 - 0.66

    0.18 - 0.24

    0

    0

    40

    60

    80

    20

    Boreal Plains – Upland

    100

    0.06 - 0.12

    0.20 - 0.29

    0.34 - 0.44

    0.29 - 0.47

    70

    20

    5

    5

    98

    2

    Boreal Foothills – Valley

    120

    0.08 - 0.17

    0.25 - 0.36

    0.33 - 0.51

    0.29 - 0.42

    40

    30

    10

    20

    90

    10

    Boreal Foothills - Mountain

    150

    0.15 - 0.25

    0.37 - 0.46

    0.48 - 0.60

    0.19 - 0.34

    40

    30

    10

    20

    80

    20

    Wet Mountain

    900

    0.74 - 0.80

    0.84 - 0.88

    0.88 - 0.92

    0.04 - 0.06

    10

    60

    10

    20

    40

    60

    Wet Trench - Valley

    600

    0.63 -0.72

    0.78 - 0.84

    0.82 -0.89

    0.05 - 0.10

    10

    60

    10

    20

    60

    40

    Wet Trench - Mountain

    800

    0.70 - 0.77

    0.82 - 0.86

    0.88 - 0.89

    0.04 - 0.07

    10

    60

    10

    20

    40

    60

    Moist Trench – Valley

    150

    0.15 - 0.25

    0.37 - 0.46

    0.48 - 0.60

    0.19 - 0.34

    70

    20

    5

    5

    90

    10

    Moist Trench - Mountain

    300

    0.39 - 0.50

    0.60 - 0.69

    0.68 - 0.76

    0.14 - 0.21

    60

    30

    5

    5

    70

    30

    McGregor Plateau

    220

    0.26 - 0.39

    0.49 - 0.60

    0.58 - 0.71

    0.16 - 0.24

    40

    45

    5

    10

    90

    10

    Moist Interior - Plateau

    100

    0.06 - 0.12

    0.20 - 0.29

    0.34 - 0.44

    0.29 - 0.47

    70

    20

    5

    5

    98

    2

    Moist Interior - Mountain

    200

    0.23 - 0.36

    0.44 - 0.57

    0.61 - 0.66

    0.18 - 0.24

    40

    30

    10

    20

    70

    30

    Omineca - Valley

    120

    0.08 - 0.17

    0.25 - 0.36

    0.33 - 0.51

    0.29 - 0.42

    60

    30

    5

    5

    95

    5

    Omineca - Mountain

    300

    0.39 - 0.50

    0.60 - 0.69

    0.68 - 0.76

    0.14 - 0.21

    40

    30

    10

    10

    70

    30

    Northern Boreal Mountains

    180

    0.20 - 0.35

    0.41 - 0.51

    0.53 - 0.64

    0.19 - 0.32

    60

    30

    5

    5

    70

    30


     

    Table 3.      Means and standard deviations of selected stand characteristics for young matrix forest (40 – 70 yrs old), mature matrix forest (70 –140 yrs old), remnant patches and old matrix forest (> 140 yrs old) for mesic sites within the SBSmk1 (adapted from DeLong and Kessler 2000).

    Stand characteristics

    Stand type

    Young

    Mature

    Remnant

    Old

    Tree density

    2597 (471)

    1910 (780)

    1165 (394)

    984 (263)

    Snag density

    268 (198)

    460 (193)

    158 (78)

    170 (72)

    >15-cm-d.b.h. tree density

    408 (273)

    860 (189)

    693 (171)

    698 (215)

    >25-cm-d.b.h. tree density

    9 (11)1

    59 (55)1

    221 (90)

    334 (99)

    >15-cm-d.b.h. snag density

    12 (17)

    59 (52)

    73 (45)

    126 (54)

    > 25-cm-d.b.h. snag density

    3 (5)1

    2 (5)1

    15 (17)

    31 (27)

    # of cavities/ha

    13 (18)

    9 (11)

    30 (34)

    18 (20)

    Average tree d.b.h. (cm)

    11.3 (1.2)

    15.4 (1.9)

    17.7 (3.7)

    20.8 (3.3)

    Table 4.      Summary statistics for CWD volume for young matrix, mature matrix, remnant patch, and old matrix forest categories. (n = 10) (from DeLong and Kessler 2000).

    Total

    < 17.5 d.b.h.

    >17.5 d.b.h.

    Category

    Mean

    Range

    SD

    Mean

    SD

    Mean

    SD

     

    Young matrix

    261.8

    5.6 - 590.3

    201.3

    76

    54.7

    188.5

    177.3

     

    Remnant patch

    229.2

    33 - 393.4

    116.4

    104.8

    46.7

    124.2

    86.5

     

    Mature matrix

    174.4

    23.4 - 283.3

    90.5

    71.8

    37.5

    84.1

    74.6

     

    Old matrix

    192.6

    38.6 - 286

    78.7

    82.5

    37.6

    112.8

    61.5

     


     

    standing snags are mostly down after 40 years, thus most of the standing live tree biomass ends up as CWD.

    Forest Management Effects

    Fire control and harvesting pattern are likely the 2 factors most affecting the natural landscape pattern and processes in this NDU.

    Effective fire control over the past 40 - 50 yrs has slowed the natural disturbance rate from 0.8 to 0.008% of the total forested area/yr. This has had the compound effect of increasing the amount of old forest in more remote areas where harvesting was not occurring (e.g., south end of Vanderhoof District) and reducing young forest established by fire. Increasing old forest that is the most susceptible to MPB and decreasing the amount of large patches of young forest that is least susceptible to MPB in some remote areas has likely exacerbated the current MPB infestation.

    Some organisms appear to be heavily dependent on fire killed forests. Hutto (1995), in a study of bird communities following stand-replacement fires in the Rocky Mountains of Montana, found that black-backed woodpeckers (Picoides arcticus) were generally restricted in their habitat distribution to standing dead forests created by stand-replacement fires.  Four talks at the recent “Disturbance Dynamics In Boreal Forests” conference in Finland dealt with fungi and insects that were either fire obligates or heavily favoured by fire. These organisms require the burned dead trees found after fire and occur at much reduced numbers after forest salvage operations (Stepnisky, unpublished data).

    While wildfire creates disturbances of all sizes and the landscape is dominated by large disturbances, forest management has generally been directed to achieve mid-sized patches (40 – 100 ha) (DeLong and Tanner 1996). Larger harvest patches often occur due to management of beetle or windthrow. Dispersed harvest of mid-sized patches is both very unnatural but also creates fragmentation and a porous landscape for spread of pests such as MPB.

    Currently, disturbance rates associated with harvesting are similar to those previously associated with wildfire. However, harvesting removes old forest at a faster rate then wildfire because harvesting concentrates on stands > 100 years of age whereas wildfire is relatively unselective as to the age of stand it will burn (Van Wagner 1978, Johnson 1992).

    Dense stands of lodgepole pine were typical after wildfire. The lowest stocking level found for young natural stands (50 yrs old) on in the SBSmk1 was 2224 sph > 7.5 dbh (Table 3) (DeLong 1998). Managed stands vary considerably in density depending on whether natural or artificial regeneration is used and the rate of ingress from naturally regenerated stems. MoF records for young managed stands in the SBSmk1 indicate stocking levels of 500 - 21 000 sph (average 3475 sph). Certain practices such as low impact site preparation, which limits mineral soil exposure, in combination with modest stocking levels (<1600 sph) may result in some stands being outside the natural range of variability in stocking level but this remains to be examined.


     

    Recommended Practices

    Old forest

    Since forests with “old forest characteristics”, on the plateau portion of this NDU, typically ranged from 120 – 200 years, it seems appropriate to have a system of rotating old forest reserves between these ages. This would insure stands with “old forest characteristics” exist but they are not unnaturally old and more susceptible to pest infestation.  Large patches (> 100 ha) of old forest should be identified and recruited such that replacement areas > 120 years old are available to replace areas > 150 years of age that would be harvested.  Recruitment areas should be preferentially selected in the following order: 1) unsalvaged wildfires, 2) partially salvaged wildfires, 3) large blocks designed to approximate wildfire that have mostly been regenerated naturally, 4) large blocks (> 100 ha) designed to approximate wildfire that have mostly been regenerated artificially, 5) large blocks (> 100 ha) that were not designed specifically to approximate wildfire and 6) small to medium sized blocks (< 100 ha). Fixed reserves may be more appropriate in the mountain portions of the NDU but may be augmented with some level of floating reserve. Table 2 contains estimates of seral stage distribution based on the natural range of variability.

    Young natural forest

    Some proportion of wildfires should be left unsalvaged to provide habitat (e.g., burned snags) that cannot be provided by young managed stands.

    Patch size

    Since medium sized patches (50 – 100 ha) are rare in the natural landscape and small patches are still naturally created by small fires, windthrow, root disease the emphasis should be on creating larger patches (> 100 ha). Larger patches should be created by aggregating recent blocks in areas previously harvested and/or by designing new large blocks in unharvested areas. Patch size distribution should follow that of wildfire shown in Table 2as closely as possible given social, logistic, or demonstrated ecological constraints. Design of blocks should follow guidance provided in DeLong (2000).

    Stocking and stand structure

    Stand density in young circumesic stands (< 40 yrs old) should generally kept at total stocking levels of > 2000 sph to approximate dense natural stands. More open patchy stocking (i.e., < 1000 sph) on hygric sites are recommended. Even-aged stands over most of the landscape would approximate the natural pattern.


     

    Wet Mountain

    Location, Climate, and Vegetation

    This unit occupies the valleys and slopes of the Rocky Mountains west of the continental divide and between 54° - 56° N latitude.

    The climate of this unit is continental, and is characterized by seasonal extremes of temperature; severe, very snowy winters; and cool, very wet, and short summers. This is the wettest of the NDU’s in the region. The temperature regime varies in a gradient from valley to mountain top. MAT of the lower elevation SBSvk is 2.6°C and 0.3°C for the higher elevation ESSFwk2. MAP data from long-term stations is 1250 and 1537mm respectively for the SBSvk and ESSFwk2. Annual snowfall often reaches 6 to 9 m depending on elevation.

    Old upland coniferous forests dominate the Wet Mountain natural landscape. Hybrid white spruce and subalpine fir are the dominant climax tree species. Lodgepole pine is limited to some wetlands and Douglas-fir to a few dry rocky ridges. Paper birch occurs as a pioneer tree in scattered recently disturbed areas. Some cottonwood occurs along the floodplains of the larger rivers. Black spruce occurs in wetlands that occupy some of the broader valley bottoms. Sitka alder (Alnus viridis ssp. sinuata) occurs commonly on slopes throughout the unit on avalanche tracks and in swales.

    Natural Disturbance Ecology

    Stand-replacement disturbance events occur at irregular intervals with as much as 1000 years between such events on any site. The stand replacement disturbance rate[3][3] for this unit is estimated to be only 0.1 % [4][4] of the total forested area/yr (DeLong 1998). The stand replacement disturbance cycle assigned to this unit is 900, based on work conducted by Hawkes et. al. and DeLong (1988). Table 2 shows the amount of forests of different age classes that would be associated with this disturbance cycle. Fire sizes are generally smaller than for other NDU’s with only 10% of the total area in patches > 1000 ha but there is still 60% in the 100 – 1000 ha patch size (Table 2).

    In the absence of stand replacement disturbance, stands are affected by damaging agents that operate in older stands, so called matrix disturbance agents (Lewis and Lindgren 2000). The agents most commonly associated with older trees in this NDU are spruce beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae), western balsam bark beetle (Dryocoetes confusus), tomentosus root disease (Inonotus tomentosus), and stem decays such as Indian paint fungus (Echinodontium tinctorium). These agents alter stand species composition and horizontal and vertical structure by causing tree mortality either on their own or in combination with other damaging agents (e.g., wind, disease). Spruce beetle may cause severe mortality at regular intervals leading to a shift in species composition to subalpine fir and release of suppressed trees (Lewis and Lindgren 2000). In the absence of lodgepole pine over most of this unit, stands attain stocking slowly even after wildfire resulting in open multi-aged early to mid successional stands (DeLong et al. 1998). The long stand replacement disturbance rate, damaging agents causing selective mortality and slow regeneration result in open multi-aged stands dominating the landscape.

    Natural stands, of any age, generally do not exceed 1000 sph > 7.5 cm dbh and density of the main canopy is generally < 400 sph (DeLong et al. 1998) (Table 5). Spruce tends to out live subalpine fir in this unit so they comprise the majority of the largest stems in older stands. Subalpine fir is more abundant as elevation increases due to their greater ability to survive in the severe high elevation environment. Density of snags > 7.5 cm dbh is highest in young (<70 yrs old) stands and generally exceeds 80 sph in most stands (Table 5). The number of snags increases with elevation such that stands in the ESSFwk2/wc3 have almost twice as many snags as equivalent stands in the SBSvk (Table 5).

    Coarse woody debris (CWD) volumes show little variation with stand age but decreases with elevation in correspondence to decreases in live tree volume (DeLong et al. 1998). Average CWD volume is generally 150 – 250 m3/ha for stands in the SBSvk and 100 – 200 m3/ha for stands in the ESSFwk2/wc3 (DeLong et al. 1998).

    Arboreal lichen abundance is high in older forests especially in the ESSFwk2/wc3. Although young stands (<70 yrs old) have lower amounts of arboreal lichen there appears to be no clear differences between mature (70 – 140 yrs) and old (>140 yrs) stands especially within the ESSFwk2/wc3 (DeLong et al. 1998).

    Forest Management Effects

    Harvesting and reforestation practices are likely the 2 factors most affecting the natural landscape pattern, stand composition and structure and associated processes in this NDU.

    Clearcut harvesting has been quite extensive in portions of this NDU resulting in more area in early seral stands and less area in older forest than would have existed in the natural landscape for at least the last 500 years. Lodgepole pine has been planted in some areas within this NDU on sites where there is no present evidence of it having occurred. Current practices favouring the planting of spruce over subalpine fir at higher elevations will likely lead to stands with a higher proportion of spruce in managed stands as compared to natural stands. Current reforestation standards for stocking will result in stands being more densely stocked and more even-aged than natural stands. The potential impacts of the conversion of a landscape dominated by older more open stands to a landscape with a high proportion of denser younger even-aged stands are uncertain. Lewis and Lindgren (2000) hyphothesize that a transition to more homogenous stands could result in significant pest outbreaks, specifically of white pine weevil (Pissodes strobi) and tomentosus root rot.


     

    Table 5.      Mean values and standard deviation (in brackets) for selected stand characteristics in young (0-70 yrs), mature (71-140 yrs) and old (>140 yrs) stands for the SBSvk and ESSFwk2/wc3 (n=4 for SBSvk, n=5 for ESSFwk2/wc3 except where noted) (Adapted from DeLong et al. 1998).

    Stand Attributes

    Sub-boreal

    Subalpine

    Young

    Mature

    Old

    Young

    Mature

    Old

    Tree density (stems/ha)

    6441

    811

    (175)

    617

    (188)

    342

    (617)2

    542

    (177)

    558

    (311)

    Spruce density (stems/ha)

    4001

    475

    (241)

    158

    (56)

    10441

    111

    133

    (103)

    Subalpine fir density (stems/ha)

    2441

    333

    (136)

    455

    (175)

    33.3

    (15.7)2

    540

    (181)

    424

    (344)

    Main canopy density (stems/ha)

    2441

    319

    (72)

    128

    (58)

    173

    (332)2

    182

    (112)

    158

    (64)

    Snags <15 cm dbh (stems/ha)

    69

    (80)

    56

    (63)

    25

    (29)

    67

    (97)

    19

    (6)

    36

    (23)

    Snags 15-25 cm dbh (stems/ha)

    86

    (52)

    14

    (14)

    17

    (11)

    222

    (177)

    64

    (23)

    52

    (23)

    Snags >25 cm dbh (stems/ha)

    103

    (83)

    25

    (32)

    39

    (29)

    253

    (129)

    158

    (150)

    62

    (58)

    Snag density (stems/ha)

    258

    (138)

    94

    (91)

    80

    (46)

    440

    (428)

    220

    (176)

    122

    (73)

    Snag basal area (m2/ha)

    10.6

    (16.2)

    7.4

    (9.6)

    12.3

    (1.1)

    25.8

    (19.9)

    17.7

    (14.8)

    8.0

    (6.7)

    Mean dbh main canopy (cm)

    24.21

    32.1

    (8.2)

    49.5

    (6.3)

    22.5

    (4.1)

    27.5

    (7.9)

    38.8

    (12.6)

    Mean dbh spruce (cm)

    15.71

    27.9

    (9.3)

    42.9

    (8.9)

    18.91

    19.71

    41.6

    (4.1)

    Mean dbh subalpine fir (cm)

    21.71

    17.0

    (7.4)

    21.6

    (3.5)

    16.7

    (4.0)2

    20.7

    (4.6)

    18.3

    (3.3)

    CWD volume <15cm diam. (m3/ha)

    16.4

    (5.7)

    13.3

    (22.5)

    9.0

    (3.6)

    9.7

    (9.5)

    4.7

    (3.0)

    8.1

    (5.8)

    CWD volume 15-25cm diam. (m3/ha)

    41.0

    (19.6)

    58.7

    (70.6)

    58.5

    (6.9)

    29.8

    (16.3)

    31.6

    (22.6)

    39.2

    (26.0)

    CWD volume >25cm diam. (m3/ha)

    132.4

    (56.8)

    175.7

    (99.0)

    183.9

    (54.2)

    72.9

    (29.6)

    117.8

    (55.9)

    157.6

    (178.5)

    Total CWD volume (m3/ha)

    189.8

    (67.5)

    264.9

    (65.9)

    251.3

    (50.1)

    111.6

    (24.2)

    154.2

    (48.6)

    204.9

    (203.6)

    1 only 1 plot had trees with >7.5cm dbh.

    2 based on 4 plots, for 3 of the plots trees over 7.5cm dbh were from the pre-disturbance cohort.


     

    Recommended Practices

    Old forest

    Since forests with “old forest characteristics” dominated the landscape in this NDU, it seems appropriate to have old forest reserves or forest > 100 yrs old well distributed throughout all watersheds. A high degree of connectivity between these old forest patches should also be managed for since there was always a high degree of connectivity of old forest in the natural landscape. Since differences between mature and old forests appear to be limited based on available data some flexibility in the current age criterion for “old growth forest” should be considered. Table 2 contains estimates of seral stage distribution based on the natural range of variability.

     

    Young natural forest

    Some proportion of areas disturbed by natural disturbance agents (e.g., wildfires, pests, wind) should be left unsalvaged to provide habitat (e.g., burned snags) that cannot be provided by young managed stands.

    Patch size

    The patch size for clearcut harvesting should follow that of wildfire shown in Table 2as closely as possible given social, logistic, or demonstrated ecological constraints. Design of blocks should follow guidance provided in DeLong (2000).

    Silviculture system

    Some form of partial cutting that approximate the effects of spruce beetle attack would seem appropriate in order to maintain the type of stand structure most common in the natural landscape. Some balance between this system and clearcut with reserves would seem most appropriate.

    Stocking and stand structure

    Appropriate measures need to be developed to achieve open patchy multi-storied stands over most of the landscape.


     

    Boreal Plains

    Location, Climate, and Vegetation

    This unit occupies the gently rolling terrain of the Taiga Plains and Boreal Plains Ecoprovinces. This NDU is found over a wide geographic range, from 54° - 60° N latitude and 119° - 123° W longitude. The unit generally occurs from the valley bottoms to 900 - 1100 m elevation, below the Boreal Foothills NDU in the south and Northern Rockies NDU in the north.

    The northern continental climate of this unit is characterized by frequent outbreaks of arctic air masses resulting in long, very cold winters and short summers. However due to long day length in the summer forest productivity is similar to areas further south. This is driest NDU in the region, with MAP ranging from 330 – 570mm, with 35-55% falling as snow. It is the coldest lower elevation NDU. MAT ranges from –2.9 to 2.0°C. The ground freezes for a large part of the year, and discontinuous permafrost is common in the northeastern parts of this NDU.

    Upland climax forests are dominated by hybrid white spruce and/or black spruce depending on topographic position and time since last stand replacement disturbance. It is theorized that in the absence of a stand replacement event, stand productivity will drop and proportion of black spruce will increase in response to reductions in soil temperatures and nutrient cycling due to the build-up of the forest floor. Trembling aspen and to a lesser extent lodgepole pine and paper birch dominate young stands. Mixed forests of trembling aspen and white spruce are very common except in areas where the spruce seed source has been removed due to land clearing.

    Wetlands are very common and diverse especially in the northern portion of this NDU. There are 7 forested and 9 non-forested wetland types recognized within this NDU. Black spruce or tamarack dominates the forested wetlands. Non-forested wetlands are most commonly dominated by speckled alder, swamp birch, Alaska paper birch (Betula neoalaskana), willows, sedges, or buckbean (Menyanthes trifoliata).

    Alluvial forests of black cottonwood, often with a minor component of spruce, are common along the floodplains of the larger rivers. Natural grassland and shrub-steppe occur on steep, south-facing slopes above some of the major rivers such as the Peace.

    Natural Disturbance Ecology

    Fire is the key stand-replacement disturbance agent operating in this unit with the exception of the broad alluvial terraces adjacent to the larger rivers. The disturbance rate[5][5] for the non-alluvial portions of this unit is estimated to be about 1% [6][6] of the total forested area/yr and has been assigned a fire cycle of 100 years. Table 2 shows the amount of forests of different age that would be associated with this fire cycle. Large wildfires (> 1,000 ha) dominated the landscape and upland sites were regenerated quickly by dense trembling aspen, trembling aspen and spruce or lodgepole pine resulting in large patches of relatively even-aged forests (Table 2). Black spruce, tamarack, Alaska paper birch and white spruce regenerated the wetland areas after fire. These stands tend to be very open and fill in over time except where they are verging on upland areas, in which case they can be denser. Small areas where fire was intense may regenerate to willow or alder (DeLong, unpublished data). Tomentosus root disease is felt to be a key disturbance agent affecting white spruce and in some localized areas may cause conversion from spruce dominated stands to aspen dominated stands over the course of 20-40 years (pers. comm. Richard Reich, Prince George MoF, Regional Pathologist). Eastern spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana) may also cause significant mortality of mature or immature spruce and lead to conversion of mixed to more pure aspen stands. Stand ages rarely exceeded 200 years but relatively large patches (>100 ha) of older forest (140 – 180 yrs) could be found scattered across the landscape (Don Rosen, unpublished data??). Although patches of old forest (> 140 yrs) likely always occurred in the landscape their position would have moved around the landscape over time. Within the boundaries of the fires 3-15% of total area of the fire can be composed of unburned mature forest remnants (Eberhart and Woodward 1987).

    During stand development, increasing amounts of white spruce and black spruce will occur in stands originally dominated by trembling aspen or lodgepole pine. This increase occurs more rapidly and these species become a more dominant portion of the canopy on wetter sites. Post-fire stands are very dense except on the wettest sites and they self thin over time. Density of snags for aspen mixedwood stands is likely similar to that reported in Lee et al. (1995). They report snag densities (±S.E.M.) of 33.0±6.8, 73.1±11.3, and 66.2±9.1 snags/ha (³10 cm dbh) for young (20-30 years), mature (50-65 years) and old (120+ years) stands, respectively.

    CWD volumes of aspen mixedwood stands are likely similar to that reported in Lee et al. (1995). They report total CWD volumes (±S.E.M.) of 108.8±5.1, 109.1±7.6, and 124.3±7.1 m3/ha for young (20-30 years), mature (50-65 years) and old (120+ years) stands, respectively.

    There is a lack of information on disturbance cycles and patch sizes with respect to flooding along the major rivers in this NDU. We have temporarily assigned a stand replacement disturbance cycle of 200 years to the alluvial portions of this NDU (Table 2). Disturbance patches are thought to be < 100 ha in size (Table 2). There is a typical flood plain succession from willow to cottonwood on the lower benches and from cottonwood to spruce on the higher benches.

    Forest Management Effects

    Fire control and harvesting pattern are likely the 2 factors most affecting the natural landscape pattern and processes in this NDU.

    Effective fire control over the past 40 - 50 yrs has slowed the natural disturbance rate (ANY DATA??). This has had the compound effect of increasing the amount of old forest in more remote areas where harvesting has not occurred and reducing young forest established by fire.

    Some organisms appear to be heavily dependent on fire killed forests. Hutto (1995), in a study of bird communities following stand-replacement fires in the Rocky Mountains of Montana, found that black-backed woodpeckers (Picoides arcticus) were generally restricted in thei